The reason I went to the Berlin Obama speech was to find out if there was non-verbal feedback or specifics that would help me believe that he really does have a plan, that he is not just another pretty-speech maker.
My first impression was that there weren’t many specifics, and that the nonverbal was confident and assured. However, when reading the transcript, it became clear that there were more specific proposals than I could absorb during the speech. Here’s a summary.
The full transcript is located here.
- The partnership between America and Europe has to be strengthened
- That partnership has to fight extremism as well as terror
- Afghanistan is first priority
- Move toward a world without nuclear weapons by reducing old arsenals and securing loose nuclear materials
- Reject a Cold War mindset and work with Russia
- Improve trade to support wealth creation while keeping meaningful protections
- Europe and America must tell Iran to stop nuclear weapon development
- Support Lebanese, Israelis and Palestinians
- Reduce carbon emissions, US in particular
Some questions he asked, that I suspect give a indication of his other intent, include:
- poverty (Bangladesh named)
- refugees (Chad)
- AIDS
- dissidence (Burma)
- free speech (blogger in Iran)
- voting freedom (Zimbabwe)
- genocide (Darfur)
- improve our reputation in the world
- reject torture and stand for rule of law
- welcome immigrants and shun discrimination
This was far more specific than I thought.
What do I see here that is meaningful? Elimination of nuclear weapons, US ownership to reduce its carbon emissions, acknowledging support for all Mideast parties.
What was NOT here that is meaningful? US needing to flex its military muscle to show its greatness, “winning” in Iraq is the most important thing, increasing missiles in eastern Europe, China (except for their pollution), oil.
I’m still on the fence, but I have more data now.